British justice, 2025: Legal to take a life, illegal to save it

A 75-year-old grandmother ‘has been arrested and charged after holding a sign outside a hospital’ reading ‘“Coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want.”’ Last Wednesday, Rose Docherty ‘was led into the back of a police van on Glasgow’s Hardgate Road, outside the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital’, and after being ‘held in custody for several hours’ – during which time, she ‘was refused a chair in her cell, despite telling police she had a double hip replacement’ - the ‘protester’ was ‘released on bail under a law which imposes so-called ‘buffer zones’ outside Scottish abortion clinics.’ Pictures show the dangerous criminal being hauled off by four policemen. 

What a pity that such ‘buffer zones’ cannot be set up around each one of us, to protect us from having four burly coppers appear, as if by magic, to haul us off to the nick.

In Rose’s case, only yards away, killing was happening in a place supposedly dedicated to caring. However, now it seems that it is illegal even to refer to such deadly developments or even hint at them. 

How long before any passer-by whose facial contortions may be interpreted as signalling disapproval, is also arrested? Before the government passes a law against ‘facecrime’?

It could be argued that the ‘organisms’ being ‘terminated’ are unknown quantities – that we do not know how they will turn out, especially given that the deadly circumstance of being ‘unwanted’ suggests the auguries are not good. But leaving aside eugenics arguments regarding these ‘little strangers’, neither do we know how the thousands of grown-up, able-bodied, single, male strangers entering our country illegally will ‘turn out’, since we know nothing at all about them.

What we do know, however, is that the governing classes see unrestricted mass immigration as a positive thing, necessary to ‘fill employment gaps’. Perhaps if the same classes had not presided over the pre-birth destruction of millions of children since 1967, we would not have such a yawning ‘gap’ in our workforce.  

Despite all this, the same classes have passed laws forbidding ‘harassment’ near abortion centres, even though such activity is already illegal. 

But even if the police will not arrest those openly killing the innocent in our ‘civilised’ society, they ought to arrest themselves, because the only harassment now taking place is against those trying to help needy pregnant mothers – trying to save helpless unborn children from a violent death. When did it become illegal to save life, rather than taking it?

   

    

---